AI Literacy in the Age of ChatGPT

Many educators don't support the use of AI writing detectors

These detectors result in both false negatives and false positives, which can result in tagging a student paper as written by AI when it wasn't.

In addition, if your native language isn't English, these tools will often tag your writing as written by AI. See GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writers - Weixin Liang, et al.

More information

• Nobody wins in a academic integrity arms race - The Chronicle of Higher Ed
• Making ChatGPT detectors part of our education system prioritizes surveillance over trust - George Veletsianos, professor of education at Royal Roads University
• What to do if you are falsely accused of cheating with AI - Dr. Lydon Walker, YouTube
  (advice for students)
• Vanderbilt University's Guidance on AI Detection and Why We’re Disabling Turnitin’s AI Detector
• Anatomy of an AI Essay - Inside Higher Ed

Instructors are creating classroom policies on the use of generative AI.

UCM AI Statement Suggestions for Syllabi

See also:

• University of Missouri System Generative AI Policies
• University of Missouri Task Force on Artificial Intelligence in the Learning Environment report
• Missouri State Teaching and Learning with Artificial Intelligence

Classroom Policies for AI Generative Tools (collected by Lance Eaton)
A crowdsourced collection of classroom policies on use of ChatGPT and other AI tools.

• Princeton University
• University of Illinois
• University of Pennslyvania
• University of Wisconsin, Madison (includes classroom activities)
• Yale University